Very sad to say the least. But it can\’t be as bad as http://www.epa.gov, which provided contractors with a template that must be adhered to, yet it doesn\’t follow Section 508 guidelines, which it\’s supposed to do.
Just done a bit of self-checking (first in a while) and dammit if I don\’t suck too. Homepage fine, comments pages duff. Caught out by an ampersand in a URL hidden field value.
7:03 am on 20 February 2004 :::
natis Says:Very sad to say the least. But it can\’t be as bad as http://www.epa.gov, which provided contractors with a template that must be adhered to, yet it doesn\’t follow Section 508 guidelines, which it\’s supposed to do.
4:18 pm on 20 February 2004 :::
Mal Says:Just done a bit of self-checking (first in a while) and dammit if I don\’t suck too.
Homepage fine, comments pages duff. Caught out by an ampersand in a URL hidden field value.
5:14 pm on 20 February 2004 :::
Matt Says:I just checked this site and noticed that there were some silly mistakes that were causing it not to validate. All fixed now though.